In July 2017, Purplebricks was worth £1.3 billion, roughly A$2.2 billion. It had taken over the UK property market, launched in Australia, and was about to push into the United States.
Six years later, the whole business sold for £1.
Not £1 million. One pound. The buyer took on the liabilities. The shareholders got nothing.
Peak
Approximate peak valuation in 2017
Sale
Acquisition price in June 2023
Expansion
UK, Australia, US, and Canada before the model broke
Overview
- 01What the Purplebricks model actually was
- 02Why the rise looked convincing at first
- 03Why the Australian launch, including Perth, failed
- 04The three structural problems that eventually collapsed the business
- 05What a flat-fee agency can still learn from the failure
What Purplebricks Was
Purplebricks started in 2012 as a hybrid agency. The pitch was simple: replace percentage commission with a fixed upfront fee, remove the expensive office network, and use local agents supported by central technology.
On paper that looked efficient. Traditional commission in the UK sat around 1.5 to 2 percent, so the fixed fee felt like a clean disruption. The problem was how the risk and incentives were distributed.
Sellers paid whether the property sold or not. Purplebricks got its money early. The customer carried the uncertainty.
The Rise: 2015 to 2017
The early growth looked extraordinary. Purplebricks listed on London's AIM market in December 2015 at 96 pence per share, revenue surged, and by mid-2017 the share price had climbed above £5.
The UK business looked like a real success story. Revenue was growing, the model felt new, and investors wanted a technology-led property narrative.
The Australian Expansion, Including Perth
Purplebricks launched in Australia in August 2016 with a flat fee of A$5,400. That was still cheaper than traditional percentage commission, but it required sellers to hand over a meaningful amount of money before a listing had proven anything.
Rollout
- August 2016: Queensland and Victoria launch
- January 2017: New South Wales launch
- March 2017: Western Australia and South Australia launch
- May 2019: Australian operations closed
Numbers
| Metric | FY2018 |
|---|---|
| Australian revenue | £13.5M (~A$24M) |
| Australian EBITDA loss | £11.8M (~A$21M) |
| Annual TV advertising spend | ~A$20M |
| Gross margin on AU operations | 47% |
For every pound earned in Australia, Purplebricks lost almost as much again. The company was trying to buy awareness in a market that was far less willing than the UK to pay a large upfront fee to an unfamiliar brand.
The offer also ran against local expectations. Australian sellers were used to paying their agent at settlement, not before the work had been proven. That made A$5,400 feel less like a saving and more like a gamble.
Industry perspective
Industry criticism was consistent: Purplebricks underestimated how emotional Australians are about property, pushed price too hard, and imported the UK model without adapting enough to the local market.
The result was a business that spent heavily on brand awareness without earning enough trust to convert that awareness into strong, repeatable seller demand.
What Actually Went Wrong
The international expansion made the collapse faster, but the core problems were already inside the model.
Problem 1
If the property sold, the fee looked clever. If it did not, the seller had already paid and then often still needed a traditional agent afterwards.
Problem 2
Purplebricks' local experts were heavily incentivised to win listings. Traditional commission agents are usually paid only when the sale completes. Purplebricks weakened that alignment on purpose.
Problem 3
Each new market demanded another expensive wave of advertising. Awareness grew faster than trust, and the customer acquisition economics never became comfortable enough to support the spend.
The Collapse and the £1 Sale
The UK business recovered briefly, then deteriorated again as revenue fell and losses widened. By early 2023 the company put itself up for sale and was eventually acquired by Strike for £1, with the buyer assuming the liabilities.
Share Price
| Event | Price |
|---|---|
| IPO price (Dec 2015) | 96p |
| Peak price (mid-2017) | ~£5.00 |
| Price by July 2022 | 14.1p |
| Decline from peak | ~97% |
| Acquisition price (Jun 2023) | £1 |
What We Took from It at KeyHive
The flat-fee idea was not the problem. The execution was. The useful lesson is not "flat fee failed," but "misaligned flat fee failed."
- Earn on completion, not on listing. If the customer carries all the risk upfront, trust becomes expensive.
- Keep the service team aligned with the result. If the operator is paid to acquire listings rather than close transactions well, the seller eventually feels that gap.
- Prove the model before scaling the spend. Advertising can amplify trust, but it cannot replace it.
FAQ
Did Purplebricks operate in Australia?
Yes. Purplebricks launched in Australia in August 2016, charging a flat fee of A$5,400. It expanded to Perth and Adelaide in early 2017. Despite reaching £13.5 million in Australian revenue in the 2017-18 financial year, the business lost more than it earned and exited the market entirely in May 2019.
Why did Purplebricks fail in Australia?
Two big reasons. First, Australians weren't used to paying thousands of dollars upfront before their home was even listed. The commission model was familiar and felt safer. Second, the company burned approximately A$20 million per year on television advertising without earning the trust that actually converts to customers. The Local Property Expert model also created weak incentives to close deals, since agents were paid per listing rather than per sale.
Who bought Purplebricks?
Strike, a UK-based hybrid estate agency backed by private equity, acquired Purplebricks in June 2023 for £1. Strike assumed all existing liabilities estimated at approximately £10 million. The remaining cash in the business covered the cost of the sale process, leaving almost nothing for shareholders.
Is the flat-fee real estate model broken?
No. The flat-fee concept is sound. What broke Purplebricks was the upfront non-refundable payment model, agent incentives misaligned with completion, and an attempt to buy market share through advertising spend rather than earning it through service quality. Flat-fee agents with lower overheads, aligned incentives, and realistic growth strategies continue to operate successfully.
What happened to Purplebricks shares?
Purplebricks listed on the London Stock Exchange's AIM market in December 2015 at 96 pence per share. The share price peaked above £5 in mid-2017. By July 2022 it had fallen to 14.1 pence, a 97 percent decline from the peak. When Strike acquired the company for £1 in June 2023, Purplebricks was delisted and the shares became worthless.
Note
We're still early. We know we have not figured out everything yet, and we are not pretending otherwise.
If you have thoughts on what a flat-fee agency should look like in Australia, or what you think we could do better, email aaron@keyhive.com.au.
Aaron Mijatovic, Co-Founder, KeyHive
Sources
Image credit
Header photo: “Purplebricks Property Sign 2021” by Purplebricks, licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. Source: Wikimedia Commons. Cropped and resized from original.
Related Articles
Fixed Fee vs Commission Perth: The No Incentive Myth Debunked
Fixed fee vs commission: which is better for Perth sellers? We debunk the “no incentive” myth and reveal what actually drives a higher sale price in WA.
Real Estate Agent Fees Perth 2026 — What You Pay
How much do real estate agents charge in Perth? Compare traditional commission, fixed fee, and DIY options side by side with exact costs at every price point.
Buying the Listing: Why Perth Agents Inflate Appraisals
“Buying the listing” is when agents inflate appraisals to win your business, then walk the price down. Here is how to spot it and protect yourself in Perth.
Ready to sell smarter?
One fixed fee. No percentage commission. No surprises at settlement.